A comparative study of the conditions of coercion in Islamic jurisprudence and Pakistani laws.

Authors

  • Dr. Ahmad Hassan Khattak Assistant Professor Department of Islamic Studies, HITEC University Taxila
  • Inayat Ur Rehman PhD Islamic studies Scholar HITEC, University Taxila
  • Dr. Zeeshan * Lecturer HITEC University Taxila

Abstract

Islam, with its foundational message, purpose, and life philosophy, serves as a comprehensive system guiding towards peace, harmony, progress, and perfection. Its principles are rooted in universality and a broad perspective, providing guidance for establishing justice and fairness across time. Emphasizing human consent and willingness, Islamic Sharia assigns significant importance to individual agency, which is deemed essential for the moral and legal accountability of human actions, including matters of faith and belief. Islamic law upholds the physical, mental, and intellectual freedom of individuals, forming the basis for many of its rulings. While coercion and reluctance are recognized within specific contexts, separate rules are prescribed for such situations. This paper offers a comparative analysis of coercion conditions in Islamic jurisprudence and the existing laws in Pakistan.

Keywords: Islam & Shariah: Ikrah: Freedom & Reluctance:  Comparative & Presented:

Downloads

Published

2024-04-24

How to Cite

Dr. Ahmad Hassan Khattak, Inayat Ur Rehman, & Dr. Zeeshan *. (2024). A comparative study of the conditions of coercion in Islamic jurisprudence and Pakistani laws . Al-Qirtas, 3(2), 29–49. Retrieved from https://al-qirtas.com/index.php/Al-Qirtas/article/view/262

Issue

Section

Articles